New User? Need help? Click here to register for free! Registering removes the advertisements.

Computer Cops
image image image image image image image image
Donations
If you found this site helpful, please donate to help keep it online
Don't want to use PayPal? Try our physical address
image
Prime Choice
· Head Lines
· Advisories (All)
· Dnld of the Week!
· CCSP News Ltrs
· Find a Cure!

· Ian T's (AR 22)
· Marcia's (CO8)
· Bill G's (CO11)
· Paul's (AR 5)
· Robin's (AR 2)

· Ian T's Archive
· Marcia's Archive
· Bill G's Archive
· Paul's Archive
· Robin's Archive
image
Security Central
· Home
· Wireless
· Bookmarks
· CLSID
· Columbia
· Community
· Downloads
· Encyclopedia
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· Gallery
· Giveaways
· HijackThis
· Journal
· Members List
· My Downloads
· PremChat
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Quizz
· RegChat
· Reviews
· Google Search
· Sections
· Software
· Statistics
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account
image
CCSP Toolkit
· Email Virus Scan
· UDP Port Scanner
· TCP Port Scanner
· Trojan TCP Scan
· Reveal Your IP
· Algorithms
· Whois
· nmap port scanner
· IPs Banned [?]
image
Survey
How much can you give to keep Computer Cops online?

$10 up to $25 per year?
$25 up to $50 per year?
$10 up to $25 per month?
$25 up to $50 per month?
More than $50 per year?
More than $50 per month?
One time only?
Other (please comment)



Results
Polls

Votes: 887
Comments: 19
image
Translate
English German French
Italian Portuguese Spanish
Chinese Greek Russian
image
image microsoft: Commentaries: Good Riddance, Win 98 image
Microsoft
Good Riddance, Win 98
By Peter Coffee
December 15, 2003

People in technology industries talk about exponential growth the way teenagers talk about sex. Everyone pretends to be having it, everyone wishes they knew how to get it and none of them fully understands the implications.

The result, when either process does take place, is that bad decisions at the beginning are drastically magnified along the way.

What got me thinking about this—about exponential growth, I mean—was this week's termination of all sales of several long-lived Microsoft products, including Windows 98. Whenever a platform product gets euthanized, I get angry mail from eWEEK readers who depend on third-party software or specialized devices that may be orphaned by the product's demise. Overall, though, I'm relieved.

Let's be sure we're using the same word to mean the same thing. Exponential does not mean fast. A quantity has exponential growth, over time, if the amount of growth from one moment to the next is in proportion to the amount itself.

If something grows at 8 percent per year, for example, then in year 0, it could grow from 100 to 108; in year 1, from 108 to 116.64. Over 10 years, simple growth of 8 units per year gets you from 100 to 180; exponential growth of 8 percent per year gets you from 100 to 216.

The difference is vastly greater when we deal with double digits. If we start at 100 and grow by 35 units per year, in 10 years we're at 450; if we grow by 35 percent per year, in 10 years we're at more than 2,000. But now we come to the implication that constantly seems to escape us, only to be painfully rediscovered again and again.

If we have 100 initial customers for a product, and 250 customers after three years on the market—a comfortable growth rate of just over 35 percent per year—we can hope to have more than 2,000 customers at the beginning of year 10, of whom 1,750 will come to us during year 3 through year 9. Seven-eighths of our customers, at that point, will be people that we attracted after three years of learning at the expense of our product's early adopters. For how long, we must ask, are we obligated to keep on making the distinctive traditional mistakes that attracted the customers who got us off the ground?

To put it another way, whose needs should an IT vendor try harder to meet? The one in eight customers who liked what was first delivered, enough to tolerate its grave limits and weaknesses? Or the seven out of eight who required something better and who came to that vendor only when that became available? And who really do hope, moreover, that their IT sources will constantly do better—and who will otherwise move on to someone less encumbered by the past?

Loyalty to a product's first users stems from laudable principles, but it's not without costs. My favorite example is the make utility program, used by software developers to automate the rebuilding of applications with many components. The make program does the almost unthinkable: It treats the tab character as a distinctive symbol, instead of being merely one of many varieties of white space. Complications ensue when other text-processing software ignores the distinction.

The explanation, admits the utility's original author, is that the pattern newline-tab worked ... and a few weeks later, I had a user population of about a dozen, and I didn't want to screw up my embedded base. The rest, sadly, is history.


More at eWeek
Posted on Tuesday, 16 December 2003 @ 04:05:00 EST by phoenix22
image

 
Login
Nickname

Password

· New User? ·
Click here to create a registered account.
image
Related Links
· TrackBack (0)
· Microsoft
· Microsoft
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· Google Microsoft Search
· Microsoft
· Technet Online
· HotFix & Security Bulletins
· More about Microsoft
· News by phoenix22


Most read story about Microsoft:
Internet Explorer file:// Request Zone Bypass Vulnerability

image
Article Rating
Average Score: 3
Votes: 3


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


image
Options

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

image
"Login" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register