New User? Need help? Click here to register for free! Registering removes the advertisements.

Computer Cops
image image image image image image image image
Donations
If you found this site helpful, please donate to help keep it online
Don't want to use PayPal? Try our physical address
image
Prime Choice
· Head Lines
· Advisories (All)
· Dnld of the Week!
· CCSP News Ltrs
· Find a Cure!

· Ian T's (AR 22)
· Marcia's (CO8)
· Bill G's (CO10)
· Paul's (AR 5)
· Robin's (AR 2)

· Ian T's Archive
· Marcia's Archive
· Bill G's Archive
· Paul's Archive
· Robin's Archive
image
Security Central
· Home
· Wireless
· Bookmarks
· CLSID
· Columbia
· Community
· Downloads
· Encyclopedia
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· Gallery
· Giveaways
· HijackThis
· Journal
· Members List
· My Downloads
· PremChat
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Quizz
· RegChat
· Reviews
· Search (Topics)
· Sections
· Software
· Statistics
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account
image
CCSP Toolkit
· Email Virus Scan
· UDP Port Scanner
· TCP Port Scanner
· Trojan TCP Scan
· Reveal Your IP
· Algorithms
· Whois
· nmap port scanner
· IPs Banned [?]
image
Survey
How much can you give to keep Computer Cops online?

$10 up to $25 per year?
$25 up to $50 per year?
$10 up to $25 per month?
$25 up to $50 per month?
More than $50 per year?
More than $50 per month?
One time only?
Other (please comment)



Results
Polls

Votes: 859
Comments: 19
image
Translate
English German French
Italian Portuguese Spanish
Chinese Greek Russian
image
image spam: Spam-Spackers: Antispam Law's Effectiveness Doubted image
SPAM
Antispam Law's Effectiveness Doubted
Tech leaders in business expect to keep their spam filters in place despite new law.
Grant Gross,
IDG News Service

WASHINGTON -- An antispam bill that was poised to become law in the new year may do little to stem the barrage of junk e-mail, according to corporate information and technology officers who deal with the problem daily.

The legislation, called the CAN-SPAM (Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing) Act, was signed into law by President George W. Bush earlier in December.

It requires senders of unsolicited commercial e-mail to let recipients opt out of future mailings, sets penalties for sending deceptive messages, and begins the process of creating a national Do Not Spam list. The measure requires all e-mail advertising--not just unsolicited messages--to include a valid reply-to address, a valid postal address, and accurate headers and subject lines.


Concerns Remain
But CIOs say it won't work, since so much spam comes from outside the United States.

Tod Ferran, CIO of Riverton Motor, an auto dealership based in Sandy, Utah, says you'd need the authority of a world government to enforce such a law. Instead, he favors a technological solution. The open-source Mozilla e-mail system he uses includes a junk e-mail filtering feature, he notes. He also recommends education of the public to not respond to spam solicitations.

Matt Kesner, chief technology officer of the Fenwick & West law firm based in Mountain View, California, says he thinks legislating against spam is worth a try. Still, he questions why Congress would pass a bill that would trump a strong new California antispam law.

That measure, passed in September but overruled by the federal law, would have required marketers to get permission from or have an existing business relationship with a recipient before sending e-mail. Without better technological and legal solutions, Kesner says he's afraid we'll get to the point where we accept e-mail only from people we know.

More at PCWorld
Posted on Friday, 26 December 2003 @ 04:25:00 EST by phoenix22
image

 
Login
Nickname

Password

· New User? ·
Click here to create a registered account.
image
Related Links
· TrackBack (0)
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· Mozilla
· Spam Cop
· More about SPAM
· News by phoenix22


Most read story about SPAM:
Messenger Pop-up Spam makes us sick

image
Article Rating
Average Score: 4
Votes: 1


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


image
Options

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

image
"Login" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | _SEARCHDIS
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Antispam Law's Effectiveness Doubted (Score: 1)
by ([email protected])  on Friday, 26 December 2003 @ 12:14:01 EST
(User Info | Send a Message)
Concerted global effort required or else forget it as it won't work. Everybody has to be singing from the same hymn sheet for it to stand a chance.