New User? Need help? Click here to register for free! Registering removes the advertisements.

Computer Cops
image image image image image image image image
Donations
If you found this site helpful, please donate to help keep it online
Don't want to use PayPal? Try our physical address
image
Prime Choice
· Head Lines
· Advisories (All)
· Dnld of the Week!
· CCSP News Ltrs
· Find a Cure!

· Ian T's (AR 23)
· Marcia's (CO8)
· Bill G's (CO11)
· Paul's (AR 5)
· Robin's (AR 2)

· Ian T's Archive
· Marcia's Archive
· Bill G's Archive
· Paul's Archive
· Robin's Archive
image
Security Central
· Home
· Wireless
· Bookmarks
· CLSID
· Columbia
· Community
· Downloads
· Encyclopedia
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· Gallery
· Giveaways
· HijackThis
· Journal
· Members List
· My Downloads
· PremChat
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Quizz
· RegChat
· Reviews
· Google Search
· Sections
· Software
· Statistics
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account
image
CCSP Toolkit
· Email Virus Scan
· UDP Port Scanner
· TCP Port Scanner
· Trojan TCP Scan
· Reveal Your IP
· Algorithms
· Whois
· nmap port scanner
· IPs Banned [?]
image
Survey
How much can you give to keep Computer Cops online?

$10 up to $25 per year?
$25 up to $50 per year?
$10 up to $25 per month?
$25 up to $50 per month?
More than $50 per year?
More than $50 per month?
One time only?
Other (please comment)



Results
Polls

Votes: 1019
Comments: 21
image
Translate
English German French
Italian Portuguese Spanish
Chinese Greek Russian
image
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Login to check your private messagesLogin to check your private messages   LoginLogin 

U.S. Supreme Court Preserves 'God' in Pledge

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic       Computer Cops Forum Index -> Religion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
AplusWebMaster

Sergeant
Sergeant



Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 111
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:52 am    Post subject: U.S. Supreme Court Preserves 'God' in Pledge
Reply with quote

FYI...

- http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s...legiance_7
40 minutes ago
"The Supreme Court at least temporarily preserved the phrase "one nation, under God," in the Pledge of Allegiance, ruling Monday that a California atheist could not challenge the patriotic oath while sidestepping the broader question of separation of church and state. The decision leaves untouched the practice in which millions of schoolchildren around the country begin the day by reciting the pledge.
The court said the atheist could not sue to ban the pledge from his daughter's school and others because he did not have legal authority to speak for her. The father, Michael Newdow, is in a protracted custody fight with the girl's mother. He does not have sufficient custody of the child to qualify as her legal representative, eight members of the court said. Justice Antonin Scalia did not participate in the case...Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist agreed with the outcome of the case, but still wrote separately to say that the Pledge as recited by schoolchildren does not violate the Constitution. Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Clarence Thomas agreed with him. The high court's lengthy opinion overturns a ruling two years ago that the teacher-led pledge was unconstitutional in public schools..."

_________________
AplusWebMaster ~ www.apluswebmaster.net
Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
AplusWebMaster

Sergeant
Sergeant



Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 111
Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 1:49 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s...playground

"...You're attempting to take the Pledge of Allegiance away from all the students at your daughter's school, and all students everywhere. And it says here that your wife -- I mean, the mother of your child -- is in favor of her little girl reciting the full pledge, and of course that California law gives her, not the absent-from-the-house father, standing in a court trial. Are you trying to get that law changed too? And while you're at it, Newdow, you intend to do something about the Hippocratic oath?"

"What about the Hippocratic oath?"

"The provision in it that says you mustn't play God."

"Who says I was trying to play God?"

"I say it. You impregnate a woman who gives birth to the child, you refuse to marry her or live with her, you protest the policies of the school the girl goes to, and you want to impose your values on the school. So that all the little boys in that school will grow up like you, a doctor who violates his Hippocratic oath, and refuses to live up to the responsibilities of a father? I call that playing God."

_________________
AplusWebMaster ~ www.apluswebmaster.net
Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
chickengirl

Sergeant
Sergeant
Premium Member
Premium Member


Joined: Apr 01, 2004
Posts: 99
Location: Montana

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 10:46 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Nice to meet you AplusWebMaster...and thanks for the links! It would seem that Mr. Newdow has brought a little more attention to himself, then he bargained for...he was so busy pointing that finger... Wink
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
ekrubtap

Lieutenant
Lieutenant



Joined: Feb 17, 2004
Posts: 289
Location: Geez if you believe in Honkus

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 10:54 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Nice quote from Bill Buckley, but shouldn't you also have quoted Pat Robertson, Rush Limbaugh, Jerry Falwell, Ann Coulter, Oral Roberts, Newt Gingritch, Billy Graham, Jimmy Swaggart, and Tammy-Faye Baker?
It is also a good example of yellow (read "trash") journalism. It is presented as a conversation with Mr. Newdow, whereas, in reality, it is a work of fiction, and clumsy at that. It's intent is to impugn Mr. Newdow's character by refering to another percieved fault in said character, That of "refusing" to marry or live with, the mother. I suspect, in the best tradition of yellow journalism, that this conclusion was reached with no reference to whatever the realities of the situation might be.
Quote:
of course that California law gives her, not the absent-from-the-house father, standing in a court trial.
Actually, Buckley and Aplus, more yellow journalism. The California court decided in favor of the father. Also, Buckley is more than a little hypocritical.........Buckley on the 1999 conservative Hillsdale College sex scandal, arguing that school officials were smart in the attempted coverup, "Such questions excite the tabloid appetites. Giving them free expression can bring on moral hangovers." Yet he feels it's perfectly acceptable to conjecture and pontificate in public
on another's alleged moral shortcomings.

In it's desire to not have to deal with the issue the Supreme Court, in fact, abdicated it's responibility, and created bad law (concerning the rights of non-custodial parents to sue on behalf of their children), when it chose to dismiss the case on a technicality. See... http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u...ney158_xml

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor observes that the expression "under God" is "... the inevitable consequence of the nation's religious founding."
Anyone who has studied the Constitution knows this is not true. Everyone who has merely read the Constitution knows that it is pointedly secular. It is secular for a reason: for the sake of freedom of conscience and of speech. See... http://computercops.biz/postt30558.html

The words "under God" are not a cherished tradition, they have been included in the pledge only in the last 50 years.

_________________
------------------------------------------------
He was a wise man who invented God.
Plato (427? - 348? CE)
------------------------------------------------
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
AplusWebMaster

Sergeant
Sergeant



Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 111
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 11:23 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Why'd the atheist get into this thread? Rolling Eyes
_________________
AplusWebMaster ~ www.apluswebmaster.net
Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
ekrubtap

Lieutenant
Lieutenant



Joined: Feb 17, 2004
Posts: 289
Location: Geez if you believe in Honkus

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 4:57 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Why not?
_________________
------------------------------------------------
He was a wise man who invented God.
Plato (427? - 348? CE)
------------------------------------------------
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic       Computer Cops Forum Index -> Religion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8a © 2001 phpBB Group

Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Version 2.2 by Paul Laudanski © 2003-2004 Computer Cops