|
Donations |
|
|
|
|
|
If you found this site helpful, please donate to help keep it online
Don't want to use PayPal? Try our physical address
|
|
|
Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bellgamin
Cadet
Joined: Nov 10, 2002
Posts: 9
Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 3:38 am Post subject: Is this a security forum or what? |
|
|
Is Computer Cops a security forum or a political soapbox?
From its title, I thought "Homeland Security" would discuss the very real problems & needs for internal defense of our nation. Instead, what I find are lengthy snips from newspaper articles, some of them leaving me wondering if somebody is trying to get readers to vote for or against
something.
If I wanted to read politically slanted news articles, I wouldn't be looking for them at a site that *purports* to deal with security matters.
Computer Cops will probably never be in the same league with wilders or dsl reports by making itself a forum for political stuff. But perhaps that is just fine with whoever runs this place.
aloha..........bellgamin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul
Admin
Joined: Feb 22, 2002
Posts: 5719
Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
You have emailed me concerning this very issue and I replied back right away asking you to show me your concerns. Per my email I stated I am open to suggestions and feedback so I hope your thread here can help make this forum either grow or may disappear.
As for comparisons to other sites, I am "Zhen-Xjell", an administrator at WildersSecurity.com, and I also am a moderator at BroadBandReports.com. So I understand how these things work: listen to the members.
_________________
I love my wife. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JackBenny
Sergeant
Joined: Jul 12, 2002
Posts: 140
Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
One thing that would help is actually starting a conversation. Articles and opinions have been posted to start discussions relating to the articles. Some receive a lot of views, but still nobody comments. If someone doesn't like or want the type of posts being seen, the thing to do is start one and try to get some of these lukers to open up.
Complaining to management is one thing, but starting the types of discussions you want to see is even better. As long as nobody wants to make any comments, or start their own threads, this place will remain a place for a very limited number of actual participants with everyone else peeking in the window, waiting for something to happen.
Paul can only do so much, after that, it's up to the rest of us, posters and lurkers alike. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bellgamin
Cadet
Joined: Nov 10, 2002
Posts: 9
Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JB - It is my belief that if one wants a good steak, he should not go to KFC to find it. Neither should one seek to have political discussions in a security forum.
You say, "Articles and opinions have been posted to start discussions..." In other words, I go to a steak house. You put a hot dog on my plate, then sit down and say, "Let's talk."
[Goodness, I should have had breakfast. All my analogies deal with food.]
As for Paul's comments - You asked for examples, so I posted a thread in this category for the simple reason that this category within your forum is, itself, THE example. In my view, it makes Computer Cops kind of the UC Berkely of security forums. To each his own.
aloha and peace to all..........bellgamin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JackBenny
Sergeant
Joined: Jul 12, 2002
Posts: 140
Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bellgamin wrote: |
You say, "Articles and opinions have been posted to start discussions..." In other words, I go to a steak house. You put a hot dog on my plate, then sit down and say, "Let's talk." |
What that meant was, somebody has to start. If people don't contribute, even with criticism, then nobody knows what they want. There are no mind readers here. I'm sure there are plenty who feel as you, but unlike you, they've said nothing, yet.
Regarding the analogy, what's happening here is that people are coming in, looking at the menu, not ordering themselves, but just watching a few others eat, then leaving. They're not asking for, or demanding what they want or expect to find. Just silence.
Hopefully, because of you and this thread, others will at least speak up so we'll know what people want to find here. Otherwise it will always be just a couple of people here talking to themselves, which gets real boring.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul
Admin
Joined: Feb 22, 2002
Posts: 5719
Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JackBenny wrote: |
Hopefully, because of you and this thread, others will at least speak up so we'll know what people want to find here. Otherwise it will always be just a couple of people here talking to themselves, which gets real boring. |
Ultimately the board is going to make it or not. This is all a public service venture right now. I don't know precisely what people want so I threw up some forums which since have been combined or removed.
This forum is just another one of those forums which will either stay, be removed, or be integrated into a more general topic forum. I don't know right now because there isn't much drive for it. If it continues like that, then the threads will be moved into another forum and this one will be closed down (or something along those lines).
However, the board is defined by the members who visit it, and of course guided by those who own it. Would you like it if the board owners picked forums and never listened to the requests of its members? I don't think the board would last long.
Translate that to CCSP: I'm listening to the members to try and deliver what is requested. You keep saying I'm trying to portray CCSP a certain way, but the forums don't indicate that.
Ok.. so what do *you* suggest be done?
It is very easy to criticize and put down. What is better IMO, and positive, is to offer constructive feedback. How can we change this forum (or forums) to better serve the community from a security perspective?
I've got several months left on the dedicated servers, and if the forums don't pick up then there is no reason for me to continue these free services including free port scanning and hopefully soon services like free online virus and spyware scanning.
So you tell me... what is it I'm trying to do here? What is it that you would like to see for forum growth and participation?
I'm not here to put anyone down ... I'm trying to add another useful resource for folks on the Internet without worry about ads or privacy breaches.
So in summary... this is a free portal structured on security. Lets remember that. Its also nice to get a little thank you once in a while too.
_________________
I love my wife.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bellgamin
Cadet
Joined: Nov 10, 2002
Posts: 9
Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is all a public service venture right now. I don't know precisely what people want so I threw up some forums which since have been combined or removed.
When one arrives, the CC forum over all doesn't have the look & feel of a popular place.
I think that feeling is intensified because CC's board presently is compartmentalized into several categories [such as a category for firewalls, another for AV, and so forth]. In a new/small board, such compartmentalization means that, under ordinary circumstances, any given category will have only a very few active threads. It gives one sort of a deserted feeling, doncha know? Plus [for someone on dial-up] it's a drag to click into a category only to find that nothing much is happening there.
Contrast that with dslreports, where there are NO compartments in the security forum. It's much easier to browse, and it *looks* busy. Of course, it truly IS busy, but even so the lack of compartmentalization makes it look even busier than it is.
Other than special cases like mailwasher, I think you might consider dumping most of the security topics into a single category [as dsl rpts does] and then -- perhaps every so often, harvest the older threads into archives and compartmentalize THOSE [the archives that is].
Compartmentalization should be done when the number and variety of threads demands it. Not before. At least that's my $.02 worth - your mileage may vary.
There are *other* ideas, too. But I dislike long comments so I'll cease.
aloha.......bellgamin
~~~~~~~
A man who moralizes is usually a hypocrite. A woman who moralizes is invariably plain. [Oscar Wilde, "Lady Windemere's Fan" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul
Admin
Joined: Feb 22, 2002
Posts: 5719
Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Letting your post sink in...
_________________
I love my wife. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JackBenny
Sergeant
Joined: Jul 12, 2002
Posts: 140
Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now there's a plan......downsize. Good idea |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alephNULL
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Funny how people on the right don't want the political issues haunting Homeland Security to be discussed or even mentioned. 'Just obey the President and don't look.' But that is backwards. Freedom to desent has always been a vital part of democracy. Let's not demonize it now.
By the way I always thought of CC as being more like the corner deli than a steak house. There is a lot to eat here and if you see something you dislike then don't put a fork in it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bellgamin
Cadet
Joined: Nov 10, 2002
Posts: 9
Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2002 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
alephNULL wrote: |
Funny how people on the right don't want the political issues haunting Homeland Security to be discussed or even mentioned. |
I rest my case. Unless I mis-read alephnull's post, this Homeland Security category is politically left-of-center -- NOT security at all, but a soapbox. Moreover, people who dare takes exception with this category are labelled as "people on the right." What comes next -- any dissenter is a Nazi?
As I said before, if you want to be the UC Berkeley of security forums, that's your business.
JB -- I must not have expressed myself clearly if you think my post advocated downsizing. Restructuring & simplification of topical categories isn't synonymous with downsizing. What I recommended is merely to consider simplification along lines similar to dslreports. Dslreports certainly isn't downsized, is it?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alephNULL
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2002 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
bellgamin wrote: |
Unless I mis-read alephnull's post, this Homeland Security category is politically left-of-center -- NOT security at all, but a soapbox. |
And just where is the center and who defines it? Soapbox? It seems to me that it is you that has taken to the soapbox. Seems to me most users here appreciate the variety, not to mention the freedom to speak their minds.
Now rather than trying to eliminate this subforum and demean it's users then why don't you post a convincing counter argument? If those whom you say are left of center are wrong. Prove it! Fact is if the "lefties" are right (no pun intended) then we are all in very deep trouble, and don't you think that might have a little something to do with security? Of course it does!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bellgamin
Cadet
Joined: Nov 10, 2002
Posts: 9
Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2002 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
First alephnull says that those who disagree with him are "people on the right" then he asks, "And just where is the center." If he doesn't already know left from right from center, how does he term me a rightist? Finally he challenges, "why don't you post a convincing counter argument?" In other words, he wants me to waste my time arguing with him instead of learning about dull stuff like firewalls and AV & AT & wormguard and privacy et alia -- that very stuff that I thought I was signing up for when I became a member here.
alephnull makes my point exactly. This is becoming a forum that solicits political arguments, if not eventual flame jobs, & allows visitors to be mudslinged as rightists.
If I come to CC forum I come to learn about and discuss computer security. Not to engage in arguments. Not to have a political diatribe. Not to be called names.
I think I shall hang my hat elsewhere for a while. No offense. I wish you folks all the best of .... whatever it is you think you're doing.
Goodbye. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alephNULL
Cadet
Joined: Dec 21, 2002
Posts: 2
Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2002 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh! I see. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JackBenny
Sergeant
Joined: Jul 12, 2002
Posts: 140
Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2002 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="bellgamin"]
alephNULL wrote: |
JB -- I must not have expressed myself clearly if you think my post advocated downsizing. |
Nope, I understood and agreed with you. Poor choice of words on my part. I think we could make do with only 8 groups, instead of 41.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8a © 2001 phpBB Group
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Version 2.2 by Paul Laudanski © 2003-2004 Computer Cops
|