View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Systemizer
Cadet
Joined: Jun 05, 2004
Posts: 9
Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:07 pm Post subject: What's better? AVG or Antivir? |
|
|
Hello,
I've got a really important question. I need a good free virusscanner. Right now I have AVG running on the background. But I also heard Antivir is very good. Now, which one of those is better?
What I think is important is:
+ A good resident shield which doesn't slow down pc performance
+ Must recognize a lot of virusses
+ Good updates and that they are available quickly
+ It shouldn't eat too much system resources
+ Duration of the scans
That's it. The last note is because I used to do scans with Kaspersky which took 8 hours to complete. I don't like that very much... Must be me |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rancid_ilike
Warnings : 2
Sergeant
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 129
Location: Malaysia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i'm prefer antivir..my final download |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Systemizer
Cadet
Joined: Jun 05, 2004
Posts: 9
Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You tried AVG too? Why is Antivir better? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rancid_ilike
Warnings : 2
Sergeant
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 129
Location: Malaysia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AVG=The installer seems to disagree with my computer
AntiVir=heuristics were included in the free version
It's availeble in the on-acess (guard) & on-demand scanner.
Seems, that Antivir is getting stronger day by day now.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NAMOR
Private
Joined: Dec 23, 2003
Posts: 45
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
+ A good resident shield which doesn't slow down pc performance |
both AV have this, but I think Antivir might be a little stronger due to a couple of false positives that it gave me. Nither seemed to slow my PC down at all.
Quote: |
+ Must recognize a lot of virusses |
I think both have good detection rates.
Quote: |
+ Good updates and that they are available quickly |
I feel that Antivir updates more frequently than AVG
Quote: |
+ It shouldn't eat too much system resources |
While both AV's are nice on resources, I feel that AVG is slightly lighter..
Quote: |
+ Duration of the scans |
Doing complete scans of my system Antivir was faster..
one big plus is that Antivir has 2 official support forums... Just something to think about. I honestly don't think one is better than the other....
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Systemizer
Cadet
Joined: Jun 05, 2004
Posts: 9
Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok then I'm going to try that one.
I need a really good free virusscanner because AVG just didn't detect a dangerous keylogger. It's gone now (kaspersky demo) but I don't want it to happen again, you know? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Systemizer
Cadet
Joined: Jun 05, 2004
Posts: 9
Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
both AV have this, but I think Antivir might be a little stronger due to a couple of false positives that it gave me. Nither seemed to slow my PC down at all. |
False positives? Sorry, but I don't really understand, what do you mean?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
NAMOR
Private
Joined: Dec 23, 2003
Posts: 45
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By false positives, I mean during a scan Antivir detects files that are up for grabs (suspicious looking). Such files can be determined to be legit or not be sumitting them to an online virus scan, such as Trend Micro's House Call. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ikeb
General
Premium Member
Joined: Apr 20, 2003
Posts: 3555
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AntiVir doesn't run on the Win2K Server platform.
_________________
I like SPAM ... on my sandwich! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Prince_Serendip
AVPE Host
Premium Member
Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Posts: 1026
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello everyone!
For the first year that I had AVPE, it was my backup to AVG. I did not run them simultaneously, always seperately. Then a virus ate the AVG core and AVPE caught it and cleaned it.
Previously, I had no false positives until I enabled Win32 heuristic scans. I turned it off. I don't have them with the macro scan.
AVG is a good AV overall. I still recommend it, but I like AVPE better for obvious reasons.
It is not "which one is better," but which one you prefer yourself. I usually advise people to have a backup scanner just in case the primary dies. There's nothing worse than going online unprotected.
We can check on the Win2K issue and see what can be done.
_________________
ASAP Expert | Please donate to Computer Cops! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ikeb
General
Premium Member
Joined: Apr 20, 2003
Posts: 3555
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Except that AVPE documentation specifically warns against installing if another AV is in place.
Sure would be good if AVPE were to allow Win2K Server. I have to use Win2K Server 'cause it allows multiprocessor operation. I think most AV vendors assume that a server implies a networked computer environment where the server is handing out AV licenses, not the case for me.
_________________
I like SPAM ... on my sandwich! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Prince_Serendip
AVPE Host
Premium Member
Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Posts: 1026
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Except that AVPE documentation specifically warns against installing if another AV is in place. |
Yes, that is correct. It's like in an engineering manual. They always write them conservatively, erring on the side of caution. "Warp 9" is the limit, or is it? Running two AV's at the same time often causes conflicts. Running one while the other is "asleep" has always worked for me.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Prince_Serendip
AVPE Host
Premium Member
Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Posts: 1026
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have an update for Ikeb, on your Win2K Server woes. Apparently, you need to get AVPro, the payware version but that is for the general server issue. I am waiting for an answer to an inquiry I made at the Antivir Support Forum on your particular issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ikeb
General
Premium Member
Joined: Apr 20, 2003
Posts: 3555
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know!! I checked it out. $700US! That includes 10 client licenses but I only need one for the server itself. Thanks for inquiring about this PS!
BTW, not that it's of any use to me at this point but just how do you put one AV "to sleep"? Kill the TSR?
_________________
I like SPAM ... on my sandwich! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Prince_Serendip
AVPE Host
Premium Member
Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Posts: 1026
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, actually. Do not use the RTM and use the backup only as an on demand scanner. Never hurts to get a second opinion. Obviously, you do not run it at startup.
Edit: AVPE is especially good as a backup scanner because the RTM is seperate from the Main program. You can do your updates manually and from the Main too.
_________________
ASAP Expert | Please donate to Computer Cops! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|